On Friday, September 24, 2010 9:32:15 am Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:34:16AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Friday, September 24, 2010 7:53:11 am Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0400, pluknet wrote: > > > > On 16 September 2010 11:56, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > Author: des > > > > > Date: Thu Sep 16 07:56:34 2010 > > > > > New Revision: 212723 > > > > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212723 > > > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > > Implement proc/$$/environment. > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > * Filler function for proc/pid/environ > > > > > */ > > > > > static int > > > > > linprocfs_doprocenviron(PFS_FILL_ARGS) > > > > > { > > > > > + int ret; > > > > > > > > > > - sbuf_printf(sb, "doprocenviron\n%c", '\0'); > > > > > - return (0); > > > > > + PROC_LOCK(p); > > > > > > > > With this change I observe the following sleepable after non- sleepable: > > > > > > > > 1st 0xffffff000290b558 process lock (process lock) @ > > > > /usr/src/sys/modules/linprocfs/../../compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c:1049 > > > > 2nd 0xffffff00028f8848 user map (user map) @ > > /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:3525 > > > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > > > db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2a > > > > _witness_debugger() at _witness_debugger+0x2e > > > > witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0x807 > > > > _sx_slock() at _sx_slock+0x55 > > > > vm_map_lookup() at vm_map_lookup+0x55 > > > > vm_fault() at vm_fault+0x113 > > > > proc_rwmem() at proc_rwmem+0x7a > > > > linprocfs_doprocenviron() at linprocfs_doprocenviron+0x122 > > > > pfs_read() at pfs_read+0x45b > > > > vn_read() at vn_read+0x256 > > > > dofileread() at dofileread+0xa1 > > > > kern_readv() at kern_readv+0x60 > > > > read() at read+0x55 > > > > syscallenter() at syscallenter+0x1aa > > > > syscall() at syscall+0x4c > > > > Xfast_syscall() at Xfast_syscall+0xe2 > > > > --- syscall (3, FreeBSD ELF64, read), rip = 0x80074134c, rsp = > > > > 0x7fffffffe9c8, rbp = 0 --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > + if ((ret = p_cansee(td, p)) != 0) { > > > > > + PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > > > > + return ret; > > > > > + } > > > > > + > > > > > + ret = linprocfs_doargv(td, p, sb, ps_string_env); > > > > > + PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > > > > + return (ret); > > > > > } > > > > > > This is easy to fix, isn't it ? But there seems to be much more nits. > > > > > > First, allocating 512 * sizeof(char *)-byte object on the stack is not > > > good. > > > > > > Second, the initialization of iov_len for reading the array > > > of string pointers misses '* sizeof(char *)'. > > > > > > And third (probably fatal) is the lack of checks that the end of > > > array and each string fits into the user portion of the map. I do not > > > see why addr that already has u_long type is casted to u_long. Also, > > > VM_MIN_ADDRESS, VM_MAXUSER_ADDRESS constants are for the native host > > > FreeBSD ABI, they may differ from the target process limits. > > > > > > Formatting is separate issue, let postpone it. > > > > > > diff --git a/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c > > b/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c > > > index c7fe158..fd62b1c 100644 > > > --- a/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c > > > +++ b/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c > > > @@ -952,12 +952,9 @@ linprocfs_doargv(struct thread *td, struct proc *p, > > struct sbuf *sb, > > > struct uio tmp_uio; > > > struct ps_strings pss; > > > int ret, i, n_elements, found_end; > > > - u_long addr; > > > - char* env_vector[MAX_ARGV_STR]; > > > + u_long addr, pbegin; > > > + char **env_vector; > > > char env_string[UIO_CHUNK_SZ]; > > > - char *pbegin; > > > - > > > - > > > > > > #define UIO_HELPER(uio, iov, base, len, cnt, offset, sz, flg, rw, td) \ > > > do { > > > \ > > > @@ -971,6 +968,10 @@ do { > > > \ > > > uio.uio_rw = (rw); \ > > > uio.uio_td = (td); \ > > > } while (0) > > > +#define VALID_USER_ADDR(addr) > > > \ > > > + ((addr) >= p->p_sysent->sv_minuser && (addr) < p->p_sysent- >sv_maxuser) > > > + > > > + env_vector = malloc(sizeof(char *) * MAX_ARGV_STR, M_TEMP, M_WAITOK); > > > > > > UIO_HELPER(tmp_uio, iov, &pss, sizeof(struct ps_strings), 1, > > > (off_t)(p->p_sysent->sv_psstrings), sizeof(struct ps_strings), > > > @@ -978,37 +979,41 @@ do { > > > \ > > > > > > ret = proc_rwmem(p, &tmp_uio); > > > if (ret != 0) > > > - return ret; > > > + goto done; > > > > > > /* Get the array address and the number of elements */ > > > resolver(pss, &addr, &n_elements); > > > > > > /* Consistent with lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c */ > > > - if (n_elements > MAX_ARGV_STR || (u_long)addr < VM_MIN_ADDRESS || > > > - (u_long)addr >= VM_MAXUSER_ADDRESS) { > > > - /* What error code should we return? */ > > > - return 0; > > > + if (n_elements > MAX_ARGV_STR || !VALID_USER_ADDR(addr) || > > > + !VALID_USER_ADDR(addr + MAX_ARGV_STR * sizeof(char *))) { > > > + ret = EFAULT; > > > + goto done; > > > } > > > > > > - UIO_HELPER(tmp_uio, iov, env_vector, MAX_ARGV_STR, 1, > > > + UIO_HELPER(tmp_uio, iov, env_vector, MAX_ARGV_STR * sizeof(char *), 1, > > > (vm_offset_t)(addr), iov.iov_len, UIO_SYSSPACE, UIO_READ, td); > > > > > > ret = proc_rwmem(p, &tmp_uio); > > > if (ret != 0) > > > - return ret; > > > + goto done; > > > > > > /* Now we can iterate through the list of strings */ > > > for (i = 0; i < n_elements; i++) { > > > found_end = 0; > > > - pbegin = env_vector[i]; > > > - while(!found_end) { > > > + pbegin = (vm_offset_t)env_vector[i]; > > > + while (!found_end) { > > > + if (!VALID_USER_ADDR(pbegin) || > > > + !VALID_USER_ADDR(pbegin + sizeof(env_string))) { > > > + ret = EFAULT; > > > + goto done; > > > + } > > > UIO_HELPER(tmp_uio, iov, env_string, sizeof(env_string), 1, > > > - (vm_offset_t) pbegin, iov.iov_len, UIO_SYSSPACE, > > > - UIO_READ, td); > > > + pbegin, iov.iov_len, UIO_SYSSPACE, UIO_READ, td); > > > > > > ret = proc_rwmem(p, &tmp_uio); > > > if (ret != 0) > > > - return ret; > > > + goto done; > > > > > > if (!strvalid(env_string, UIO_CHUNK_SZ)) { > > > /* > > > @@ -1017,7 +1022,7 @@ do { > > > \ > > > * the pointer > > > */ > > > sbuf_bcat(sb, env_string, UIO_CHUNK_SZ); > > > - pbegin = &(*pbegin) + UIO_CHUNK_SZ; > > > + pbegin += UIO_CHUNK_SZ; > > > } else { > > > found_end = 1; > > > } > > > @@ -1025,9 +1030,12 @@ do { > > > \ > > > sbuf_printf(sb, "%s", env_string); > > > } > > > > > > +#undef VALID_USER_ADDR > > > #undef UIO_HELPER > > > > > > - return (0); > > > +done: > > > + free(env_vector, M_TEMP); > > > + return (ret); > > > } > > > > > > static void > > > @@ -1052,9 +1060,11 @@ linprocfs_doprocenviron(PFS_FILL_ARGS) > > > PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > > return ret; > > > } > > > + _PHOLD(p); > > > + PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > > > > > ret = linprocfs_doargv(td, p, sb, ps_string_env); > > > - PROC_UNLOCK(p); > > > + PRELE(p); > > > return (ret); > > > } > > > > You need to add a P_WEXIT check here. _PHOLD() / PRELE() do not work > > once P_WEXIT is set (rather, exit1() may not notice and wait for a > > _PHOLD() invoked to drain once P_WEXIT is set). > > Hmm, I think that PHOLD is not needed there, actually. Pseudofs > checks for exiting process in pfs_visible(_proc). Before the fill > method is called, process is held and unlocked. So my second _PHOLD > could be removed.
Yes, I think that is true. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
