Author: andre
Date: Sat Aug 14 21:41:33 2010
New Revision: 211317
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211317
Log:
When using TSO and sending more than TCP_MAXWIN sendalot is set
and we loop back to 'again'. If the remainder is less or equal
to one full segment, the TSO flag was not cleared even though
it isn't necessary anymore. Enabling the TSO flag on a segment
that doesn't require any offloaded segmentation by the NIC may
cause confusion in the driver or hardware.
Reset the internal tso flag in tcp_output() on every iteration
of sendalot.
PR: kern/132832
Submitted by: Renaud Lienhart <renaud-at-vmware com>
MFC after: 1 week
Modified:
head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c
Modified: head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c Sat Aug 14 21:04:27 2010
(r211316)
+++ head/sys/netinet/tcp_output.c Sat Aug 14 21:41:33 2010
(r211317)
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ tcp_output(struct tcpcb *tp)
int idle, sendalot;
int sack_rxmit, sack_bytes_rxmt;
struct sackhole *p;
- int tso = 0;
+ int tso;
struct tcpopt to;
#if 0
int maxburst = TCP_MAXBURST;
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ again:
SEQ_LT(tp->snd_nxt, tp->snd_max))
tcp_sack_adjust(tp);
sendalot = 0;
+ tso = 0;
off = tp->snd_nxt - tp->snd_una;
sendwin = min(tp->snd_wnd, tp->snd_cwnd);
sendwin = min(sendwin, tp->snd_bwnd);
@@ -490,9 +491,9 @@ after_sack_rexmit:
} else {
len = tp->t_maxseg;
sendalot = 1;
- tso = 0;
}
}
+
if (sack_rxmit) {
if (SEQ_LT(p->rxmit + len, tp->snd_una + so->so_snd.sb_cc))
flags &= ~TH_FIN;
@@ -1051,6 +1052,8 @@ send:
* XXX: Fixme: This is currently not the case for IPv6.
*/
if (tso) {
+ KASSERT(len > tp->t_maxopd - optlen,
+ ("%s: len <= tso_segsz", __func__));
m->m_pkthdr.csum_flags |= CSUM_TSO;
m->m_pkthdr.tso_segsz = tp->t_maxopd - optlen;
}
_______________________________________________
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
