On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:09:32PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 02:07:44PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:00:46AM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > Author: kib > > > Date: Fri Jul 23 11:00:46 2010 > > > New Revision: 210409 > > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/210409 > > > > > > Log: > > > Crypto(4) driver for AESNI. > > > > > > The aeskeys_{amd64,i386}.S content was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, > > > no objections to the license from core. > > > > If code was mostly obtained from OpenBSD, why license does not credit > > it? > > Should it ? OpenBSD took Intel code. There is no OpenBSD copyright on the > files in the OpenBSD repo. > > The files already have enough sad history behind them.
OK, I trust your judgment here. It just was not obvious from the commit message. Sorry I did not look at OpenBSD original files. ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-head-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
