On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 08:51:30PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> ...
> > > --- head/sbin/ipfw/Makefile Tue Mar 2 17:34:11 2010
> > > (r204590)
> > > +++ head/sbin/ipfw/Makefile Tue Mar 2 17:40:48 2010
> > > (r204591)
> > > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> > > PROG= ipfw
> > > SRCS= ipfw2.c dummynet.c ipv6.c main.c nat.c altq.c
> > > WARNS?= 2
> > > -DPADD= ${LIBUTIL}
> > > LDADD= -lutil
> > > MAN= ipfw.8
> > Removal of DPADD is most likely regression ?
>
> possibly.
> i couldn't figure out why it was there in the
> first place, can you clarify what it was for ?
To depend on the libutil, so that ipfw is reloaded when libutil.a is
changed.The question I do not know answer for, is why do we need LDADD.
pgp9F6mw7l8mk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
