Warner Losh <[email protected]> writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> writes: > > I would prefer calling this MK_ATF than MK_TESTS_SUPPORT, though. > > The test framework is probably useful on its own. > That would be a nicer name, but then we’d lose the automatic setting > when MK_TESTS is enabled (unless we add another special case, which is > the opposite direction that I want to go in). How strongly do you feel > that’s a better name?
Is _SUPPORT magic? I didn't know. I guess MK_TESTS_SUPPORT is good enough, especially if it's on by default. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [email protected] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
