On Aug 24, 2014, at 16:01, Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 24 Aug, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On Aug 24, 2014, at 14:44, Peter Wemm <pe...@wemm.org> wrote: >>> >>> On Sunday 24 August 2014 21:21:54 Don Lewis wrote: >>>> Author: truckman >>>> Date: Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014 >>>> New Revision: 270510 >>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270510 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Catch up to gcc 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. >>>> >>>> MFC after: 3 days >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> head/ObsoleteFiles.inc >>>> >>>> Modified: head/ObsoleteFiles.inc >>>> ============================================================================ >>>> == --- head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sun Aug 24 19:31:26 2014 >>>> (r270509) >>>> +++ head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014 (r270510) >>>> @@ -3205,6 +3205,202 @@ OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_concat.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_label.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_nop.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=lib/geom/geom_stripe.so.1 >>>> +# 20040728: GCC 3.4.2 >>>> +OLD_DIRS+=usr/include/c++/3.3 >>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/FlexLexer.h >>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/algorithm >>>> +OLD_FILES+=usr/include/c++/3.3/backward/algo.h >>> >>> I suspect that there's a story here that needs to be told.. >> >> Yes, if it hasn't been a problem in 10 years, why do it now? > > I found those leftovers on one of my machines. They are probably > harmless cruft, but I thought a few other folks might be in the same > situation. > > One could argue that older entries should eventually get pruned. We've > got stuff in there dating back to 1996 ...
Right. I don't think we have a policy on this, so I can't argue against your change. -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
