On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Julian Elischer wrote:

After that it'd be nice to write a set of mbuf list macros for abstract the whole queue, dequeue, concat, iterate, etc (like sys/queue.h, but for mbufs.)

What do people think?

(I've been doing it for m->next chained things, but not m->m_nextpkt things..)

I was thinking: new interfaces.. (your -multi names sound good). macros for handling said lists so that people don't screw them up Old drivers run with no change.

To me, the name "multi" is ambiguous: could be multicast. If we call the new datastructure "mbqueue" or "mqueue", then we should name the method ether_input_mbqueue or ether_input_mqueue.

Robert








-adrian


On 18 November 2013 14:58, George V. Neville-Neil <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Author: gnn
Date: Mon Nov 18 22:58:14 2013
New Revision: 258328
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258328

Log:
Allow ethernet drivers to pass in packets connected via the nextpkt pointer. Handling packets in this way allows drivers to amortize work during packet reception.

   Submitted by: Vijay Singh
   Sponsored by: NetApp

Modified:
   head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c

Modified: head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c Mon Nov 18 22:55:50 2013        (r258327)
+++ head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c Mon Nov 18 22:58:14 2013        (r258328)
@@ -708,13 +708,25 @@ static void
  ether_input(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m)
  {

+       struct mbuf *mn;
+
         /*
- * We will rely on rcvif being set properly in the deferred context,
-        * so assert it is correct here.
+ * The drivers are allowed to pass in a chain of packets linked with
+        * m_nextpkt. We split them up into separate packets here and pass
+        * them up. This allows the drivers to amortize the receive lock.
          */
- KASSERT(m->m_pkthdr.rcvif == ifp, ("%s: ifnet mismatch", __func__));
+       while (m) {
+               mn = m->m_nextpkt;
+               m->m_nextpkt = NULL;

-       netisr_dispatch(NETISR_ETHER, m);
+               /*
+ * We will rely on rcvif being set properly in the deferred context,
+                * so assert it is correct here.
+                */
+ KASSERT(m->m_pkthdr.rcvif == ifp, ("%s: ifnet mismatch", __func__));
+               netisr_dispatch(NETISR_ETHER, m);
+               m = mn;
+       }
  }

  /*


_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to