On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:

 Allow ethernet drivers to pass in packets connected via the nextpkt pointer.
 Handling packets in this way allows drivers to amortize work during packet 
reception.

 Submitted by:  Vijay Singh
 Sponsored by:  NetApp

Currently, it is quite easy to make mistakes regarding individual mbuf chains vs. lists of mbuf chains. This leads me to wonder whether a new type, perhaps simply constructed on the stack before passing in, should be used for KPIs that accept lists of packets. E.g.,

        /*
         * This structure is almost always allocated on a caller stack, so
         * cannot itself be queued without memory allocation in most cases.
         */
        struct mbuf_queue {
                struct mbuf     *mq_head;
        };

        int
        ether_input(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf_queue *m)
        {

                ...
        }

        ...
                struct mbuf_queue mq = { m };

                return (ether_input(ifp, &mq));
        ...

That way the compiler can help us figure out where we expect an individual packet but have accidentally leaked a queue. Functions that accept only a single packet could also more agressively assert that m->m_nextpkt is NULL:

        M_ASSERT_ONEPACKET(m);

Robert


Modified:
 head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c

Modified: head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c Mon Nov 18 22:55:50 2013        (r258327)
+++ head/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c Mon Nov 18 22:58:14 2013        (r258328)
@@ -708,13 +708,25 @@ static void
ether_input(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m)
{

+       struct mbuf *mn;
+
        /*
-        * We will rely on rcvif being set properly in the deferred context,
-        * so assert it is correct here.
+        * The drivers are allowed to pass in a chain of packets linked with
+        * m_nextpkt. We split them up into separate packets here and pass
+        * them up. This allows the drivers to amortize the receive lock.
         */
-       KASSERT(m->m_pkthdr.rcvif == ifp, ("%s: ifnet mismatch", __func__));
+       while (m) {
+               mn = m->m_nextpkt;
+               m->m_nextpkt = NULL;

-       netisr_dispatch(NETISR_ETHER, m);
+               /*
+                * We will rely on rcvif being set properly in the deferred 
context,
+                * so assert it is correct here.
+                */
+               KASSERT(m->m_pkthdr.rcvif == ifp, ("%s: ifnet mismatch", 
__func__));
+               netisr_dispatch(NETISR_ETHER, m);
+               m = mn;
+       }
}

/*

_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to