On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 12:00:59 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: > I think the important thing here is that there _are_ organisations > that rely on some reasonable attempt at supporting historical APIs > where needed. > > This IMHO should've explicitly gone into a compat macro for people who > want support of this older stuff. > > My suggestion for a saner way to handle this deprecation schedule: > > * do the announce - I'd have to go looking for that, but we should be > placing these somewhere obvious (like a wiki page that lists > deprecated APIs in order, with the date/release they're going to be > deprecated); > * deprecate the userland use of the ioctl values first so they use the > newer API; > * deprecate the kernel API after the announced amount of time, hiding > things behind COMPAT_xxx as appropriate.
Actually, Gleb has mostly done this, it's just that the last step turned into an rm rather than moving under an #ifdef COMPAT_xxxx. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
