On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 07:43:52AM +0100, Stefan Neudorf wrote:
> Konstantin Belousov <kostik...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:20:52PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Stefan Neudorf wrote:
> >> > Konstantin Belousov <k...@freebsd.org> writes:
> >> > > Modified: head/usr.bin/limits/limits.c
> >> > > ==============================================================================
> >> > > --- head/usr.bin/limits/limits.c Mon Oct 21 16:44:53 2013
> >> > > (r256849)
> >> > > +++ head/usr.bin/limits/limits.c Mon Oct 21 16:46:12 2013
> >> > > (r256850)
> >>
> >> > This adds limits -e support only for sh, csh, tcsh. What about other
> >> > shells that already support sbsize and swapuse extensions?
> >>
> >> This can be done later; the kqueue rlimit need not be gated on it.
> >
> > I definitely do not want to go over the {pd,}ksh, zsh, bash, rc and
> > whatever else. Somebody who cares should contact the projects and
> > propose the changes.
>
> Ah, you didn't catch my hint. There's no kqueues rlimit in contrib/tcsh.
> I've submitted one upstream but it'd take some time before the next
> release appears and we can update.
>
> http://mx.gw.com/pipermail/tcsh-bugs/2013-October/000844.html
I can just apply the upstream patch to our contrib/tcsh, without
waiting for import of new version. Can you point me to the way to get
the commit which was referenced in the mail above ?> > Same for zsh which also has csh-like rlimits. > > http://sourceforge.net/p/zsh/code/ci/790a4fe
pgpmmKirbJGYC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
