On Oct 12, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Mark R V Murray wrote:

> 
> On 12 Oct 2013, at 17:35, "Teske, Devin" <devin.te...@fisglobal.com> wrote:
>> Can you maybe test with ZFS + Geli? I'm concerned because we told it to use 
>> random(4)
>> instead of urandom(4). I hope there's enough entropy when creating the geli 
>> stuff that
>> said process doesn't hang. I think DES's patch will help there too (not that 
>> anyone
>> testing our ZFS patches reported any hangs... including when testing GELI -- 
>> this was
>> before DES's patch).
> 
> urandom is a symlink to random.
> 

Hmmm, interesting ;D

You know... for years I've been compiling a custom apache for $work and using 
the
--with-random=/dev/urandom flag. And then recently in the past couple years in 
8.x
I recall having problems with a GnuPG related tool that would hang due to lack 
of
entropy on a freshly installed box when generating "stuff" using random(4).

Are the days of choosing between urandom(4) and random(4) over?

Would SSL function great on a freshly installed box even if using random(4) for
apache? (it wants to default to /dev/random anyways)
-- 
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to