On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 04:00:44PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > [ +gabor ]
> 2013/5/22 Ed Schouten <e...@80386.nl>: > > Oh, the horror! I thought on FreeBSD, we used the LC_CTYPE files to do > > a mapping to ISO 10646. Unfortunately, it seems to be the case that > > these files are only used to do mappings to > > uppercase/lowercase/runetype. Bummer. > So I think the solution to this problem is twofold. First, let's look > at the case where people have built world with WITH_ICONV=. Instead of > implementing the *c32* functions on top of the *wc* variants, we can > simply use libiconv. The following patch adds two new variants of the > *c32* functions, implemented on top of libiconv. > At first I tried implementing these functions on top of > iconv_open_into(), but unfortunately it seems to be the case that the > iconv_allocation_t is larger than the mbstate_t, meaning we cannot > safely embed one into the other. To work around this, I'm using the > internal _citrus_* API. > http://80386.nl/pub/uchar-iconv.txt > Jilles, Gabor, could you please take a look at the patch, whether it's > any good? The idea seems good. I have not tested it, though. It seems better to implement c16rtomb_l() and mbrtoc16_l() in the same way, rather than duplicating the UTF-16 coding and passing a pointer to a mbstate_t which actually has only 120 bytes of storage rather than the required 128 bytes. > Now we still have the case where the system is built WITHOUT_ICONV=. I > think it really depends on the future of iconv in base how complete we > should attempt to make it. Gabor, is there a chance WITH_ICONV= will > become the default in FreeBSD 10? If ache@ is right about configure scripts, it is an option to expose the new functions only for WITH_ICONV=. -- Jilles Tjoelker _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"