On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:49:02PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: B> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 05:59:24PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: B> > B> > Modified: B> > B> > head/lib/libkvm/kvm.h B> > B> > B> > B> > Modified: head/lib/libkvm/kvm.h B> > B> > ============================================================================== B> > B> > --- head/lib/libkvm/kvm.h Thu Apr 11 07:02:27 2013 (r249354) B> > B> > +++ head/lib/libkvm/kvm.h Thu Apr 11 07:30:49 2013 (r249355) B> > B> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ B> > B> > #define _KVM_H_ B> > B> > B> > B> > #include <sys/cdefs.h> B> > B> > -#include <sys/_types.h> B> > B> B> > B> The __uintXX_t types are declared here, and should be used, like the B> > B> __Xsize_t types already are. B> > B> > Why non-standard types should be used instead of standard ones? B> B> Sometimes because the namespace doesn't allow the standard ones, but B> here I was just saying to typedef just the standard ones that you need B> (only uint64_t?) as is done for size_t and ssize_t. Including B> <sys/types.h> also turns the careful ifdefs for the latter into B> no-ops.
What was the reason to avoid including types.h and typedefing size_t and ssize_t manually? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
