On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:35 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:09:42 pm Davide Italiano wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 3:41 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > On Monday, February 25, 2013 9:13:02 pm Xin LI wrote: >> >> Author: delphij >> >> Date: Tue Feb 26 02:13:02 2013 >> >> New Revision: 247300 >> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/247300 >> >> >> >> Log: >> >> Expose timespec and timeval macros when __BSD_VISIBLE is defined. This >> >> allows userland application to use the following macros: >> >> >> >> timespecclear, timespecisset, timespeccmp, timespecadd, >> >> timespecsub; >> >> >> >> timevalclear, timevalisset, timevalcmp. >> > >> > Why not fix truss to use the stock functions instead of keeping private >> > "unusual" versions? >> > >> > -- >> > John Baldwin >> >> time.h is already a mess in terms of namespace pollution, and this >> exposure might not help thing. >> Other details here: >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.architechture/15518 > > I think that is orthogonal. Even if this is reverted I think truss should > be changed to use the "normal" timespecsubt() macro rather than using a custom > one with a different argument order. > > -- > John Baldwin
When I talked about "exposure" I referred about timeval/timespec macros(). I wasn't arguing about your proposed change. Sorry if it wasn't clear. -- Davide "There are no solved problems; there are only problems that are more or less solved" -- Henri Poincare _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
