on 13/12/2012 22:17 Attilio Rao said the following: > Right, but as I said, for the time being we can at least have a > correct panic() semantic and take the right time to fix the > generic_stop_cpus() and then absorb also the panic() fix into it. > Right now the mechanism is still broken in panic and it can be fixed > with a very easy fix, so we should just do it. > This will also help vendors like Sandvine which may have hit just this bug > too.
Perhaps I got confused... Could you please re-explain to me your suggestion to fix panic(9)? Because I thought that it would require exactly the same steps as fixing generic_stop_cpus(). Sorry about this. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
