On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 03:50:12PM +0000, Christian Brueffer wrote: > Author: brueffer > Date: Sun Jul 15 15:50:12 2012 > New Revision: 238491 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238491 > > Log: > Save a bzero() by using M_ZERO. > > Obtained from: Dragonfly BSD (change > 4faaf07c3d7ddd120deed007370aaf4d90b72ebb) > MFC after: 2 weeks > > Modified: > head/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_node.c > > Modified: head/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_node.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_node.c Sun Jul 15 15:23:31 2012 > (r238490) > +++ head/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_node.c Sun Jul 15 15:50:12 2012 > (r238491) > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ loop: > if (fap == NULL) > return ENOENT; > > - np = malloc(sizeof *np, M_SMBNODE, M_WAITOK); > + np = malloc(sizeof *np, M_SMBNODE, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); > error = getnewvnode("smbfs", mp, &smbfs_vnodeops, &vp); > if (error) { > free(np, M_SMBNODE); > @@ -235,7 +235,6 @@ loop: > return (error); > } > vp->v_type = fap->fa_attr & SMB_FA_DIR ? VDIR : VREG; > - bzero(np, sizeof(*np)); > vp->v_data = np; > np->n_vnode = vp; > np->n_mount = VFSTOSMBFS(mp);
How about moving this malloc right before np is actually used? While here some style(9) fixes. http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/smbfs_node-malloc.patch Completely untested (even compile-time); I guess the idea is clear. :) -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com> _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
