On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:49:26AM +0000, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date: Thu Mar 15 11:49:26 2012
> New Revision: 233002
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233002
> 
> Log:
>   Remove impossible error condition from the man page.
>   
>   On FreeBSD, all processes have a process group, so it is impossible for
>   kill(2) to fail this way.  POSIX also doesn't mention this error
>   condition.
>   
>   Discussed on:       arch@
>   MFC after:  3 weeks
> 
> Modified:
>   head/lib/libc/sys/kill.2
> 
> Modified: head/lib/libc/sys/kill.2
> ==============================================================================
> --- head/lib/libc/sys/kill.2  Thu Mar 15 11:06:37 2012        (r233001)
> +++ head/lib/libc/sys/kill.2  Thu Mar 15 11:49:26 2012        (r233002)
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  .\"     @(#)kill.2   8.3 (Berkeley) 4/19/94
>  .\" $FreeBSD$
>  .\"
> -.Dd March 10, 2012
> +.Dd March 15, 2012
>  .Dt KILL 2
>  .Os
>  .Sh NAME
> @@ -123,9 +123,6 @@ is not a valid signal number.
>  .It Bq Er ESRCH
>  No process can be found corresponding to that specified by
>  .Fa pid .
> -.It Bq Er ESRCH
> -The process id was given as 0
> -but the sending process does not have a process group.
>  .It Bq Er EPERM
>  The sending process is not the super-user and its effective
>  user id does not match the effective user-id of the receiving process.
As I mentioned in the thread on list, removal of ESRCH from the list of errors
is wrong.

Attachment: pgpnFBDOkCHgt.pgp
Description: PGP signature



Reply via email to