On 18. Dec 2011, at 17:48 , Marius Strobl wrote: > Author: marius > Date: Sun Dec 18 17:48:54 2011 > New Revision: 228694 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228694 > > Log: > Fix compilation on sparc64 by actually supplying the bus_dma_tag_t member > of the rx_ring to bus_dmamap_sync(9).
Thanks! > Given that netmap code tries to > obtain the bus addresses of netmap buffers via vtophys(9) instead of using > bus_dma(9) it currently has zero chance of actually working on sparc64 > though (and for that matter f.e. also not with MACs limited to 32-bit DMA > on x86 machines with more than 4GB of RAM). > > Modified: > head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h > > Modified: head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h Sun Dec 18 17:42:26 2011 > (r228693) > +++ head/sys/dev/netmap/if_em_netmap.h Sun Dec 18 17:48:54 2011 > (r228694) > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ em_netmap_rxsync(void *a, u_int ring_nr, > if ((curr->status & E1000_RXD_STAT_DD) == 0) > break; > ring->slot[j].len = le16toh(curr->length); > - bus_dmamap_sync(rxr->tag, rxr->rx_buffers[l].map, > + bus_dmamap_sync(rxr->rxtag, rxr->rx_buffers[l].map, > BUS_DMASYNC_POSTREAD); > j = (j == lim) ? 0 : j + 1; > /* make sure next_to_refresh follows next_to_check */ -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"