2011/12/12 Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>:
> on 12/12/2011 19:05 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> More precisely, what do you think about the patch below?
>> I just didn't revert the moving of systm.h under param.h because Bruce
>> seems to prefer that.
>>
>> I'm starting test-compile right now, let me know your preference.
>
> The patch looks good to me.
>
>> Index: sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c
>> (revision 228438)
>> +++ sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/dtrace/dtrace.c     (working 
>> copy)
>> @@ -5877,6 +5877,9 @@ dtrace_probe(dtrace_id_t id, uintptr_t arg0, uintp
>>         volatile uint16_t *flags;
>>         hrtime_t now;
>>
>> +       if (SCHEDULER_STOPPED())
>> +               return;
>> +
>
> I think that this could even be "panicstr != NULL", there is probably no use 
> for
> DTrace at panic time.

I agree, I will go with panicstr.

>
>>  #if defined(sun)
>>         /*
>>          * Kick out immediately if this CPU is still being born (in which 
>> case
>> Index: sys/security/mac/mac_priv.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- sys/security/mac/mac_priv.c (revision 228438)
>> +++ sys/security/mac/mac_priv.c (working copy)
>> @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>>  #include "opt_mac.h"
>>
>>  #include <sys/param.h>
>> -#include <sys/systm.h>
>>  #include <sys/kernel.h>
>>  #include <sys/priv.h>
>>  #include <sys/sdt.h>
>
> I would even keep this inclusion, just for the "why not" reason.

If it passes testing I will remove it as it is unneeded.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to