On 2011-11-14 06:31, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Nov-12 20:16:07 +0000, David Chisnall <thera...@freebsd.org> wrote: ... >> +#define SIG_ATOMIC_MIN LONG_MIN >> +#define SIG_ATOMIC_MAX LONG_MAX > > 2) As far as I can see, all other defines in _stdint.h, across all > architectures, have explicit lengths, so I believe this would be > better specified as: > > #define SIG_ATOMIC_MIN INT64_MIN > #define SIG_ATOMIC_MAX INT64_MAX
Why? On amd64, sig_atomic_t is defined as long, so LONG_MIN and LONG_MAX are more logical. In fact, for all architectures, sig_atomic_t is either int or long, so INTnn_MIN/MAX is rather strangely chosen. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
