Author: alc Date: Fri May 20 17:28:00 2011 New Revision: 222137 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222137
Log: Fix spelling errors. Modified: head/sys/vm/uma_int.h Modified: head/sys/vm/uma_int.h ============================================================================== --- head/sys/vm/uma_int.h Fri May 20 17:03:23 2011 (r222136) +++ head/sys/vm/uma_int.h Fri May 20 17:28:00 2011 (r222137) @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ * * The uma_slab_t may be embedded in a UMA_SLAB_SIZE chunk of memory or it may * be allocated off the page from a special slab zone. The free list within a - * slab is managed with a linked list of indexes, which are 8 bit values. If + * slab is managed with a linked list of indices, which are 8 bit values. If * UMA_SLAB_SIZE is defined to be too large I will have to switch to 16bit * values. Currently on alpha you can get 250 or so 32 byte items and on x86 * you can get 250 or so 16byte items. For item sizes that would yield more @@ -56,9 +56,9 @@ * wasted between items due to alignment problems. This may yield a much better * memory footprint for certain sizes of objects. Another alternative is to * increase the UMA_SLAB_SIZE, or allow for dynamic slab sizes. I prefer - * dynamic slab sizes because we could stick with 8 bit indexes and only use + * dynamic slab sizes because we could stick with 8 bit indices and only use * large slab sizes for zones with a lot of waste per slab. This may create - * ineffeciencies in the vm subsystem due to fragmentation in the address space. + * inefficiencies in the vm subsystem due to fragmentation in the address space. * * The only really gross cases, with regards to memory waste, are for those * items that are just over half the page size. You can get nearly 50% waste, _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
