On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 07:56:55PM +0000, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > Author: trociny > Date: Sun Mar 27 19:56:55 2011 > New Revision: 220062 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/220062 > > Log: > In g_gate_create() there is a window between when g_gate_softc is > registered in g_gate_units array and when its sc_provider field is > filled. If during this period g_gate_units is accessed by another > thread that is checking for provider name collision the crash is > possible. > > Fix this by adding sc_name field to struct g_gate_softc. In > g_gate_create() when g_gate_softc is created but sc_provider is still > not sc_name points to provider name stored in the local array. > > Approved by: pjd (mentor) > Reported by: Freddie Cash <fjwc...@gmail.com> > MFC after: 1 week > > Modified: > head/sys/geom/gate/g_gate.c > head/sys/geom/gate/g_gate.h > > Modified: head/sys/geom/gate/g_gate.c > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/geom/gate/g_gate.c Sun Mar 27 19:29:18 2011 > (r220061) > +++ head/sys/geom/gate/g_gate.c Sun Mar 27 19:56:55 2011 > (r220062) > @@ -409,13 +409,14 @@ g_gate_create(struct g_gate_ctl_create * > for (unit = 0; unit < g_gate_maxunits; unit++) { > if (g_gate_units[unit] == NULL) > continue; > - if (strcmp(name, g_gate_units[unit]->sc_provider->name) != 0) > + if (strcmp(name, g_gate_units[unit]->sc_name) != 0) > continue; > mtx_unlock(&g_gate_units_lock); > mtx_destroy(&sc->sc_queue_mtx); > free(sc, M_GATE); > return (EEXIST); > } > + sc->sc_name = name; > g_gate_units[sc->sc_unit] = sc; > g_gate_nunits++; > mtx_unlock(&g_gate_units_lock); > @@ -434,6 +435,9 @@ g_gate_create(struct g_gate_ctl_create * > sc->sc_provider = pp; > g_error_provider(pp, 0); > g_topology_unlock(); > + mtx_lock(&g_gate_units_lock); > + sc->sc_name = sc->sc_provider->name; > + mtx_unlock(&g_gate_units_lock); I think you do not need a mutex locked around the single assignment. As I understand, sc_provider->name is constant ?
pgpWiGCrhAZuT.pgp
Description: PGP signature