On Friday, February 25, 2011 5:23:04 am Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 2:03:33 pm Remko Lodder wrote: > >>> > > [contex restored: > > +A priority of 19 or 20 will prevent a process from taking any cycles from > > +others at nice 0 or better.] > > > [strip information overload]. > > So, what is the consensus instead of overwelming me with too much information?
Take that sentence out. It is not accurate for our schedulers. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
