On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 8:12:28 am Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:56:25PM +0000, John Baldwin wrote: > > Author: jhb > > Date: Wed Feb 23 12:56:25 2011 > > New Revision: 218967 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218967 > > > > Log: > > Fix off-by-one error in check against max_threads_per_proc. > > > > Submitted by: arundel > > MFC after: 1 week > > > > Modified: > > head/sys/kern/kern_thr.c > > > > Modified: head/sys/kern/kern_thr.c > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sys/kern/kern_thr.c Wed Feb 23 10:28:37 2011 > > (r218966) > > +++ head/sys/kern/kern_thr.c Wed Feb 23 12:56:25 2011 > > (r218967) > > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ create_thread(struct thread *td, mcontex > > p = td->td_proc; > > > > /* Have race condition but it is cheap. */ > > - if (p->p_numthreads >= max_threads_per_proc) { > > + if (p->p_numthreads > max_threads_per_proc) { > > ++max_threads_hits; > > return (EPROCLIM); > > } > > I do not think there was off by one error. The create_thread() function > is called to create new thread, and before the process thread counter > is incremented in thread_link(). The old test tried to not allow more > then max_threads_per_proc threads in a process, now it allows to > create max_threads_per_proc. > > My guess is that the reference to mentioned pthread_vfork_test failed > because reporter set kern.threads.max_threads_per_proc to 100. The > test actually tries to create 101 threads, 1 main + 100 new.
Ugh, pointy hat to me for jumping on this too quickly. I will revert. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
