On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <b...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Author: bz
Date: Sat Jan 22 22:57:28 2011
New Revision: 217733
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/217733
Log:
Properly document what the top-level `make tinderbox` does.
Reviewed by: jmallett
MFC After: 3 days
X-MFC: build.7 only
As much as I like make universe and tinderbox, for the purpose of
development testing would it make sense if there was a tinderbox
target that actually died on its first failure? tinderbox and universe
I think not really; if you want to catch errors, you want all of them
and not just the first broken kernel if there are 12.
seems to be useful when dealing with known breakage or when executing
periodic builds, but I don't know think it's as effective with
development testing, as for some of the stuff I just want to build on
something other than my host arch and another arch that isn't x86 (say
arm, mips, powerpc) just to make sure that I didn't break anything
endian wise (if the code is that nasty).
make universe TARGETS=arm
or
make universe TARGETS="i386 amd64 sparc64 ia64"
works perfectly well (again). Even
make universe TARGETS=mips TARGET_ARCH=mips64eb KERNCONFS=XLR64
should be perfectly fine.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
<ks> Going to jail sucks -- <bz> All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
