On 12/29/2010 05:00, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Warner Losh<i...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2010 19:09, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:02:57PM -0800, Colin Percival wrote:
On 12/27/10 17:59, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:52:40PM +0000, Colin Percival wrote:
Make it possible to specify WITHOUT_MODULES in a kernel config file.
Can you explain how this differs from
makeoptions NO_MODULES
which has been able to do for years?
NO_MODULES means what it says: No modules.
WITHOUT_MODULES="foo bar baz" means "go ahead and build modules except
for foo,
bar, and baz".
Thanks. The distincion wasn't clear from the commit log.
I read it as "Build a kernel WITHOUT building MODULES",
which is what NO_MODULES does.
which is why I'd like to have its name changed: it is confusing this way...
Wouldn't it be better to have MODULES_EXCLUDE and MODULES_INCLUDE
or something along those lines? MODULES_OVERRIDE doesn't really have a
nice clean antonym to go with it according to my friendly neighborhood
thesaurus.
Yes. jhb and I have been talking about this, and will have some changes
soon.
Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
