On Fri Oct 8 10, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Mon, 04.10.2010 at 14:04:53 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 4 October 2010 13:42, Alexander Best <arun...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > good point. ZFS should really be added to the list and LFS should go > > > away. are > > > there any other relevant filesystems without a fixed-block size that need > > > to be > > > mentioned? what about afs? or tmpfs? > > > > (it's not that the block sizes aren't fixed, it's that the assignment > > of blocks to the file is not fixed). > > Review of attached patch, anyone? I didn't come up with a clever way to > describe non-COW file systems :/
i like it. personally i'd prefer "which is using a Copy-On-Write strategie." instead of "which is using Copy-On-Write." but that's just personal taste. ;) cheers. alex -- a13x _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
