"M. Warner Losh" <i...@bsdimp.com> writes: > You'll find that a number of structures are potentially already > allocated with less than required alignment. There's about a dozen > places in the tree that would start to fail if we did this, or the > stronger form of __aligned(8). We could add that to the other > structures, but then we're breaking ABI rules, I think.
__aligned(4) won't affect struct addrinfo since the sockaddr immediately follows a socklen_t, which is 32 bits wide and has 32-bit alignment. A sockaddr_* allocated with malloc() will already be aligned, and so will a sockaddr_* created on the stack. The only problem is sockaddr_un, because its size is not a multiple of 4, so if you allocate an array of sockaddr_un, every other element will be misaligned. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
