On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:49:07PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > I think that the first question we want to ask is : Do we want to > support LOCALBASE being different than /usr/local > I honestly don't see any advantages of making it !=/usr/local/ and > before we start putting a lot of new/useless(for I guess 99% of our > user base) in the tree we should here why people are using /usr/pkg or > whatever weird location. > If they have some good argument, then we should proceed further.
I would be delighted to be able to install _and use_ two independent set of packages from the same base system install. Without recursing to jails, X forwarding, etc. In fact I would like to use /usr/local and e.g /usr/local-i386 on amd64 machine. I am fine with me building both of them in my instance of poudriere. But indeed I am not sure if this worth the effort of many people, for many hours. If it puts too high burden on everybody, then it is not a good feature. Otherwise, it is very convenient in some situations. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
