On 2 Jun 2020, at 10:36, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:

 Hello Hans,

On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:19:45 +0000 (UTC)
Hans Petter Selasky <hsela...@freebsd.org> wrote:

Author: hselasky
Date: Tue Jun  2 10:19:45 2020
New Revision: 361723
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/361723

Log:
  Implement struct_size() function macro in the LinuxKPI.

  MFC after:    1 week
  Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies

Modified:
  head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/kernel.h

Modified: head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/kernel.h
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/kernel.h Tue Jun 2 09:45:43 2020 (r361722) +++ head/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/include/linux/kernel.h Tue Jun 2 10:19:45 2020 (r361723)
@@ -555,4 +555,10 @@ linux_ratelimited(linux_ratelimit_t *rl)
        return (ppsratecheck(&rl->lasttime, &rl->counter, 1));
 }

+#define        struct_size(ptr, field, num) ({ \
+       const size_t __size = offsetof(__typeof(*(ptr)), field); \
+ const size_t __max = (SIZE_MAX - __size) / sizeof((ptr)->field[0]); \ + ((num) > __max) ? SIZE_MAX : (__size + sizeof((ptr)->field[0]) * (num)); \
+})
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_KERNEL_H_ */

 Can you bump FreeBSD_version so I can fix
https://github.com/freebsd/drm-kmod/ and update the
graphics/drm-devel-kmod port please ?

I almost wonder if we want a “linuxkkpi version” to check instead.
If there’s a lot more “work” on the linuxkpi we might not want to bump __FreeBSD_version for every change which can conflict/affect external code?

/bz

_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to