On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 10:46 -0300, Renato Botelho wrote: > On 08/02/20 18:17, Eitan Adler wrote: > > Author: eadler > > Date: Sat Feb 8 21:17:48 2020 > > New Revision: 357683 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/357683 > > > > Log: > > memset.3: better fix previous typo > > > > Upon re-reading the whole sentence this is a better fix. > > > > MFC with: r357681 > > > > Modified: > > head/lib/libc/string/memset.3 > > > > Modified: head/lib/libc/string/memset.3 > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/lib/libc/string/memset.3 Sat Feb 8 21:02:20 2020 > > (r357682) > > +++ head/lib/libc/string/memset.3 Sat Feb 8 21:17:48 2020 > > (r357683) > > @@ -63,8 +63,9 @@ Undefined behaviour from > > .Fn memset , > > resulting from storage overflow, will occur if > > .Fa len > > -is greater than the length of buffer > > -.Fa dest . > > +is greater than the length of the > > +.Fa dest > > +buffer. > > The behaviour is also undefined if > > .Fa dest > > is an invalid pointer. > > .Dd should be bumped to current date >
It has always been my understanding for that we don't bump .Dd for things like minor grammar and spelling fixes, only for actual content changes. A few seconds of quick googling finds mailing list messages to that effect going back many many years. -- Ian _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
