Sorry, should be: Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22504
On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 2:57 AM Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > On 22 Nov 2019, at 23:23, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > Author: cem > > Date: Fri Nov 22 23:23:40 2019 > > New Revision: 355024 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/355024 > > > > Log: > > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH > > > > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH, after SI_SUB_TASKQ and before SI_SUB_SMP > > (EARLY_AP_STARTUP). Rename existing "SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1" to > > SI_SUB_EPOCH. > > > > epoch(9) consumers cannot epoch_alloc() before > > SI_SUB_EPOCH:SI_ORDER_SECOND, > > but likely should allocate before SI_SUB_SMP. Prior to this change, > > consumers (well, epoch itself, and net/if.c) just open-coded the > > SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1 order to match epoch.c, but this was fragile. > > > > Reviewed by: mmacy > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22503 > > That’s the wrong review URL? _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
