On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:50:04 -0500 Andrew Gallatin <galla...@cs.duke.edu> wrote:
> On 12/17/18 2:08 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: [snip] > > iflib uses queuing techniques to significantly pessimize em NICs with 1 > > hardware queue. On fast machines, it attempts to do 1 context switch per > > This can happen even w/o contention when "abdicate" is enabled in mp > ring. I complained about this as well, and the default was changed in > mp ring to not always "abdicate" (eg, switch to the tq to handle the > packet). Abdication substantially pessimizes Netflix style web > uncontended workloads, but it generally helps small packet forwarding. > > It is interesting that you see the opposite. I should try benchmarking > with just a single ring. > Why are iflib and ifdi compiled into EVERY kernel with device ether and/or device pci when only a few NICs actually use iflib? This is really unnecessary bloat in an already bloated kernel. I use if_re which does not use iflib. I removed iflib and ifdi from /sys/conf/files and my network still works just fine. It seems to me like these iflib entries need finer-grained options, e.g. one of the NICs which use iflib is enabled, before pulling them into the kernel build. -- Gary Jennejohn _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"