On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 09:16:48PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20091221220004.ga42...@alchemy.franken.de> > Marius Strobl <mar...@alchemy.franken.de> writes: > : On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:59:21PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > : > On Monday 21 December 2009 2:43:23 pm John Baldwin wrote: > : > > Author: jhb > : > > Date: Mon Dec 21 19:43:23 2009 > : > > New Revision: 200797 > : > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200797 > : > > > : > > Log: > : > > Use _once() to initialize the pthread key for thread-local storage to > hold > : > > the results of localtime() instead of using a pthread mutex directly. > : > > : > It would probably be simpler to use TLS for this instead, but I'm not > sure if > : > we have working TLS on all supported platforms. > : > > : > : At least not on arm and sparc64 as the in-tree binutils predate > : GNU TLS support for these. > > We really need newer binutils in the tree. > > And we need a way to compiler gplv3 binutils into the system for folks > that can do that without consequences... But many modern processors > need to have the gplv3 version of binutils and that will be a > continuing problem. One advantage of FreeBSD is its integration, > rather than having to play version whack-a-mole like you do with > embedded Linux.
well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker the problem? _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
