[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Rodney W. Grimes > <free...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > From the Linux man page at: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/ls.1.html > > > > Using color to distinguish file types is disabled both by default and > > with --color=never. With --color=auto, ls emits color codes only > > when standard output is connected to a terminal. The LS_COLORS > > environment variable can change the settings. Use the dircolors > > command to set it. > > > > Um, so by default we should not be doing any colour... and we are... > > > > I don't recall making any argument that we're trying to match GNU > ls(1) behavior. Furthermore, again, we aren't doing any color by > default- only when the COLORTERM environment variable is set.
So we are intentially being different? > > ls(1) on FreeBSD historically honors -an- environment variable for > enabling color. Short history, long history it had no color support at all. > This environment variable is CLICOLOR. This commit > switched the environment variable honored to the more-standard > COLORTERM that is honored in other software and set by terminals that > are generally expected to be used with color. > > I'm writing an UPDATING entry for this now to notify these users that > they should remove COLORTERM from their environment if they do not, in > fact, want a colored terminal. Is that the only way to turn this off? That may not be desired either. Atleast GNU ls allows me to force it off on command invocation with --color=never, do we have an equivelent? -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"