On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Lytochkin Boris <lytbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Max Laier <m...@love2party.net> wrote: > [cut] > > I just tested an install of r197983 (9.0-CURRENT) that I had on a > test-box and > > route-to works as it is supposed to - AFAICT. FWIW, pf sets sin_len for > every > > use. > > > > Might be a problem/mis-understanding in the OPs configuration that is the > > issue here? > > > > I'll follow up to the thread on -net@ is a second. > > I posted my pf config in original message to -net@: > ===== > scrub in all fragment reassemble > pass in all flags S/SA keep state > pass out quick route-to (em0 10.60.128.254) inet from 10.60.128.0/24 > to any flags S/SA keep state > ===== > > Pretty simple. Even when forward is disabled packets that are matched > by route-to rule are forwarded to default gateway instead of specified > in route-to. And I checked rtalloc_ign_fib() arguments when using pf - > seems that pf does not use this function to lookup route-to route. > > +sem@ > > My crystal ball is broken. Explain your freebsd config, your network topology, some debug output and then it can be considered useful. There are many people using route-to on FreeBSD 8 so it would have come up before. > -- > Regards, > Boris Lytochkin > -- Ermal _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
