On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:56:18AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Luigi Rizzo <ri...@iet.unipi.it> writes: > > What do you mean exactly ? > > When libsbuf was ported to userland, sbuf_printf() was pessimized due to > the limitations of libc's printf(). This makes certain parts of
but, isn't this an implementation detail ? What prevents the same API to have two different implementation, one for kernel, one for userland ? cheers luigi > pseudofs extremely inefficient: for instance, if you read from a > /proc/whatever that's backed by an sbuf, it has to generate the entire > file even if you only asked for a small chunk at a large offset. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - d...@des.no _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
