> On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 19:02 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > > So, the takeaway is, this change stays, and stable/11 users that build > > > their own ports are on their own? > > > > > > Whatever happened to POLA? > > I have no idea, but I fully agree that changing compilers 30 days before > > a code slush is just a very bad move. > > > > The llvm in 11.1 is 4. > > Is there some pressing reason that we need llvm 6 to be in release 11.2? > > > > Looks like I wont be upgrading to 11.2 as I am sure I'll have blocking > > issues with some ports. > > > > Though I could probably build them with 11.1, I hate that idea as then > > I have to keep an 11.1 around incase I need to rebuild something. > > > > :-( > > I was hoping to import 11.2 to our repo at $work and be shipping > products based on it later this year. But there's no way we have > resources available to sidetrack and start debugging out of the blue > failures of ports that have been working fine for us until now. I guess > the best I can do now is import 11-stable immediately before the > compiler change. At least I was lucky enough to get all the arm changes > important for us MFC'd before the compiler change.
Or checkout 11.2 and revert this commit locally, then commit that to your repo at $work. -- Rod Grimes rgri...@freebsd.org _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
