On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:56:51PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi, > > * Jun Kuriyama <kuriy...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Can you test with these patches? Testing on only one of both system > > is enough. "patch-1" forces disabling CLFLUSH feature even if SS bit > > exists. "patch-2" forces no CLFLUSH tweak. I'd like to know with > > which patch your system can live. > > For some reason they both seem to boot. Yikes. I've done some more > testing and it seems the old version even hangs if I add some additional > printf's above and below, which makes me believe the problem is a bit > more complex than we realize...
The only thing I see now is that TUNABLE_INT declaration is not needed, since SYSINIT is started after hammer_time(), so TUNABLE_FETCH is processed after everything is done for BSP. Wait, are your machines SMP ? Hmm, could you, please, remove TUNABLE_INT() and see how it ends up ?
pgp0xlOgmUP7c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
