On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 01:35:25PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > On 7/3/2017 1:17 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> On 07/02/17 21:53, Conrad Meyer wrote: > >>> Does this change the behavior of 'patch -p1' (for example) with 'git > >>> diff' generated diffs? So patches that could be applied with -p1 > >>> before now need to be applied with -p0? Or is this a different mode > >>> of patch? > >> > >> IMHO, the (new) BSD patch behavior is somewhat more natural in the sense > >> that no one asked git to add a prefix to the path so it makes sense to > >> ignore it. > > > > But -p1 already solves the problem; why add any ad-hoc handling to some > > particular program that tends to generate patches whatever the way it > > does? > > The behavior only applies to git diffs.
But -p1 already solves the problem in a generic way. What good is to add specific code to make it git-or-next-cool-kid-on-the-block-aware? ./danfe _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
