> On Feb 13, 2017, at 22:19, Ed Schouten <e...@nuxi.nl> wrote: > > Hi there, > > 2017-02-13 20:53 GMT+01:00 Ngie Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com>: >> Thanks! Should kqueue(2)/kevent(2) be updated? > > I'm really not sure what's best here. On one hand the header no longer > depends on <sys/event.h>, but the man page does refer to types and > identifiers that are no longer declared by simply including this > header. > > Maybe it's best to leave it there, so that it's more likely for people > to write code that also builds with previous versions of this header?
Hm… Thinking about this a bit more, I think it’s a good idea to update
the manpages. My gut says that unless the explicit requirement is removed,
people will keep on using the old #include list. Maybe a note should be made in
the BUGS section about sys/types.h being required in previous releases (or
folks should just pay attention to previous versions’ manpages *shrugs*?)?
Thanks!
-Ngie
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
