On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:36:58PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: > + adrian@, who prompted me to look at UDP in the first place > > > I'm really not sure what my next step should be. I'm willing to revert > r304436, but I really don't want to revert r304437 because we've seen > crashes in the real world due to the missing locking. Unfortunately, > reverting r304436 would mean that every UDP packet would incur the overhead > of an additional rlock/runlock call, which is what I've been trying to > avoid. I don't see a particularly good path forward.
As I understund specific handling of broadcast required only for routers (by RFC1812). For host enought have [hidden] alias with broadcsts bits. Anyway, don't should relay on the L2 information, you can recive L3 unicast addressed packets (with alien dst IP address) in L2 broadcas packet. Sorry if I am miss something in you discurs. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
