False

On Sat, Jul 2, 2016, 11:09 AM Edward Tomasz Napierała <tr...@freebsd.org>
wrote:

> On 0630T1455, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Author: mav
> > Date: Thu Jun 30 14:55:49 2016
> > New Revision: 302297
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/302297
> >
> > Log:
> >   Revert r299454 and r299448.
> >
> >   Those changes were found confusing FreeBSD libc ACL code, that doesn't
> >   differentiate ACL for directories and files, and report ACLs for all
> >   directories created after those patches as non-trivial.  On the other
> >   side these changes were considered wrong from POSIX and NFSv4 points of
> >   view.  Until further investigation done upstream, revert those changes
> >   locally in preparation for FreeBSD 11.0 release.
>
> Thanks!  But it still doesn't pass the regression tests, due to broken
> (or at least incompatible) interaction between inheritance and umask.
>
> _______________________________________________
> svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
-- 

Daniel Torres
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to