On 05/29/16 14:06, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message <201605291817.u4tihnn7040...@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert
writes:
In message <574b2eac.3010...@freebsd.org>, Pedro Giffuni writes:
On 29/05/2016 12:37, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message <201605291618.u4tgitnj024...@repo.freebsd.org>, "Pedro F.
Giffuni" w
rites:
Author: pfg
Date: Sun May 29 16:18:55 2016
New Revision: 300961
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300961
Log:
one-true-awk: replace 0 with NULL for pointers
Also remove a redundant semicolon.
Submitted upstream already.
Modified:
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/b.c
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/lex.c
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/maketab.c
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/parse.c
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/run.c
vendor/one-true-awk/dist/tran.c
Was this commit and r300962 obtained from the upline or vendor or were
these commits local to FreeBSD only?
There is no public awk public repository AFAICT, but bwk acknowledged
the submission.
The change to openresolv was merged to the public repository.
As they've acknowledged the submissions, can you please tag the new
versions of awk and openresolve with the correct upstream version numbers,
please?
Additionally, if there are no new version numbers, what reason is there for
polluting the vendor branch with local patches to it? Is not the vendor
branch for virgin code retrieved (or received) from the vendor (or upline)?
Heck!
Can't you simply trust the committer knows what he is doing?
http://roy.marples.name/projects/openresolv/info/12cb1c1fb10df107
For nawk there is not public repository but bwk's acknowlegement said:
"Thanks -- that's something that I should have done long long ago."
So I think both changes are pretty much vendor code now.
Pedro.
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
