On 23/01/2016 11:25 PM, Edward Tomasz Napierala wrote: > Author: trasz > Date: Sat Jan 23 12:25:24 2016 > New Revision: 294627 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/294627 > > Log: > Advertise support for ext3 and ext4. > > MFC after: 1 month > Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation > > Modified: > head/share/man/man5/ext2fs.5 > > Modified: head/share/man/man5/ext2fs.5 > ============================================================================== > --- head/share/man/man5/ext2fs.5 Sat Jan 23 12:19:37 2016 > (r294626) > +++ head/share/man/man5/ext2fs.5 Sat Jan 23 12:25:24 2016 > (r294627) > @@ -26,12 +26,12 @@ > .\" > .\" $FreeBSD$ > .\" > -.Dd October 1, 2013 > +.Dd January 23, 2016 > .Dt EXT2FS 5 > .Os > .Sh NAME > .Nm ext2fs > -.Nd "Ext2fs file system" > +.Nd "ext2/ext3/ext4 file system" > .Sh SYNOPSIS > To link into the kernel: > .Bd -ragged -offset indent > @@ -47,8 +47,14 @@ The > driver will permit the > .Fx > kernel to access > -.Tn Ext2 > +.Tn ext2 , > +.Tn ext3 , > +and > +.Tn ext4 > file systems. > +The > +.Tn ext4 > +support is read-only. > .Sh EXAMPLES > To mount a > .Nm
Thanks for this :) Thoughts on renaming the module to something less specific than ext2, like extfs? Does anyone remember this question coming up before? If I had a dollar for every user I've helped find this, that has replied 'oh! I thought that was only ext2', I'd have like $43. Also, any reason why we don't have a mount_extfs(8) command? Can we also have (man,mount) aliases for each of extN that is supported? Asking for a friend (the community) ./koobs _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
