On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, 16:38+0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
Maxim Konovalov <ma...@macomnet.ru> writes:
fixed, thanks.
It still says
static void
usage()
I know this is allowed by C99, but it's not allowed by style(9).
From style(9):
static void
usage()
{
/* Insert an empty line if the function has no local variables. */
...
Apart from the empty line, what's wrong?
style(9) hasn't been converted to its own religion yet :-). This isn't
exactly a bug, since an old-style Standard C function definition is
still Normal for usage(). Normal file order is a prototype for usage(),
then main() calling usage(), then usage(), so a separate prototype for
usage() is Normal. Then usage an old-style definition for usage() breaks
K&R support without affecting Standard C support.
Bruce
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
