On 10/17/2015 12:34 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 16.10.2015 21:26, Alexander Motin wrote: >> On 16.10.2015 21:17, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 10/16/2015 1:57 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: >>>> Author: mav >>>> Date: Fri Oct 16 08:57:11 2015 >>>> New Revision: 289415 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/289415 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Bump version and add notice about incompatibility introduced by resumable >>>> send/receive support in ZFS. >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> head/UPDATING >>>> head/sys/sys/param.h >>>> >>>> Modified: head/UPDATING >>>> ============================================================================== >>>> --- head/UPDATING Fri Oct 16 08:22:21 2015 (r289414) >>>> +++ head/UPDATING Fri Oct 16 08:57:11 2015 (r289415) >>>> @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 11 >>>> disable the most expensive debugging functionality run >>>> "ln -s 'abort:false,junk:false' /etc/malloc.conf".) >>>> >>>> +20151015: >>>> + Added ZFS support for resumable send/receive changed respective >>>> + IOCTL API/ABI. Compatibility ABI shims were provided for other >>>> + functionality, while receive require version match between world >>>> + and kernel. >>> >>> This means for example that 'zfs recv' in a 10.2 jail running on a 11.0 >>> kernel will not work? Can compatibility be added for it? >> >> The structures passed as argument for receive are large and completely >> different. Unfortunately I don't know enough about that code to say >> whether new one can be forged from the old one. I'll take another look, >> but can not promise anything. > > My first thought I was wrong. r289445 should fix compatibility. >
Thank you! While I don't run this setup I could see it being a common issue otherwise. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
