On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 19:53 +0000, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > Author: simon > Date: Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 > New Revision: 194210 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194210 > > Log: > Bump __FreeBSD_version for OpenSSL 0.9.8k import. > > Modified: > head/sys/sys/param.h > > Modified: head/sys/sys/param.h > ============================================================================== > --- head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:51:43 2009 (r194209) > +++ head/sys/sys/param.h Sun Jun 14 19:53:52 2009 (r194210) > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ > * is created, otherwise 1. > */ > #undef __FreeBSD_version > -#define __FreeBSD_version 800097 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > +#define __FreeBSD_version 800098 /* Master, propagated to newvers */ > > #ifndef LOCORE > #include <sys/types.h>
It's been suggested we change the heuristic to be stable branches start
with 200. I think we're going to do that so don't panic about there
only being one number left for changes between now and the time we
branch.
At first it surprised me we ate through almost 100 version numbers in
head, which is a place traditionally abi changes are *expected* and the
attitude has more or less been head is a free-for-all with all bets off.
But some IRC chatter enlightened me to there actually being people who
do advanced testing of ports and whatnot in head under the encouragement
of portmgr@ despite its free-for-all nature to try and cut down on work
during later stages of the release. That seems reasonable so I think in
general starting to give more than 100 bumps to work with in head is
worthwhile.
Thanks...
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensm...@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
