On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 12:04:53AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/4/7 Dmitry Marakasov <amd...@amdmi3.ru>: > > * Robert Watson (rwat...@freebsd.org) wrote: > > > >> I get quite a lot of console spam in 8.x right now every boot: > >> > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1a is ufsid/472fc8054efc5e4a. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1e is ufsid/472fc8053581dc9c. > >> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/472fc8054efc5e4a removed. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1a is ufsid/472fc8054efc5e4a. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/472fc8053581dc9c removed. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad0s1e is ufsid/472fc8053581dc9c. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/472fc8054efc5e4a removed. > >> GEOM_LABEL: Label ufsid/472fc8053581dc9c removed. > > It's not specific to new development but a standard issue with any labels ... > > > Yeah, and btw there are the same messages at least for msdosfs and > > iso9660. I guess it's time to silence all these altogether. > > ... and I agree. While useful as a diagnostic, they may be a little > too much now that UFS IDs are integrated. > > It is simple to set the default verbosity level for glabel lower than > it is now. But it will be global - for all types of labels. > > Consensus?
IMO the whole thing should be reworked so the labels don't vanish when used, but until that happens, we should probably hide all the noise under boot verbose. -- Brooks
pgpil627ZS4ge.pgp
Description: PGP signature
