On Sun, Mar 15, 2009, Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 07:36:13PM +0000, David Schultz wrote: > > Author: das > > Date: Sat Mar 14 19:36:13 2009 > > New Revision: 189824 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/189824 > > > > Log: > > Make gcc use C99 inline semantics in c99 and gnu99 mode. This was the > > original intent, but the functionality wasn't implemented until after > > gcc 4.2 was released. However, if you compiled a program that would > > behave differently before and after this change, gcc 4.2 would have > > warned you; hence, everything currently in the base system is > > unaffected by this change. This patch also adds additional warnings > > about certain inline function-related bogosity, e.g., using a > > static non-const local variable in an inline function. > > > > These changes were merged from a snapshot of gcc mainline from March > > 2007, prior to the GPLv3 switch. I then ran the regression test suite > > from a more recent gcc snapshot and fixed the important bugs it found. > > I also squelched the following warning unless -pedantic is specified: > > > > foo is static but used in inline function bar which is not static > > > > This is consistent with LLVM's behavior, but not consistent with gcc 4.3. > > thnx a lot for doing this! just a quick question - what is the fallback > strategy for ports that will die on this?
It depends, but the compiler option -fgnu89-inline (supported in gcc 4.2+) should do the trick. _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
